I am talking abt the rigid gender roles which do limit women. Their complement limits men. Both have right to life.
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
.
@HPluckrose@Europa1492 I'm denying such as a thing as "gender role" exist in a rigid fashion. It is a time-tested convention for happiness2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @AnonMuser @Europa1492
Well, they do. Men must be hard-working & successful. Women must be nurturing & stay at home. Mostly defeated them.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Wrong. 1) Replace MUST by SHOULD (big difference), and 2) This only applies if one wants happiness. .
@HPluckrose@Europa14922 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @AnonMuser @Europa1492
If every1 was happy w/ traditional gender roles, I doubt there'd ever have been a drive to escape them. I wouldn't be
9 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Family is like democracy. Not every one needs it. If you have a better alternative for happiness, go for it! Choice .
@HPluckrose@Europa14921 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
.
@HPluckrose@Europa1492 Your baseless claim that feminism doesn't undermine "family" and "rigid gender roles" exist in the West.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @AnonMuser @Europa1492
1) Feminism has moved on from family-bashing. 2) I don't claim western women restricted to rigid gender roles.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Oh no! You can't go that route. Feminism is the root spring of poison for anti-family intersectionality. .
@HPluckrose@Europa14922 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
I don't think you'll find intersectionals being anti-family. They come from a different place.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.