Feminism is the theory, lesbianism is the practice. If you seriously didn't know this, look it up.
-
-
Replying to @AnonMuser
.
@AnonMuser@Europa1492 I've written much on feminism,thanks. Here's is a guide which includes political lesbianism. http://helensatheistblogs.blogspot.co.uk/2016/06/a-twitter-users-guide-to-different.html …2 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
However, 1) feminism is much more wide-ranging than this & 2) the existence of lesbians does not attack trad families
1 reply 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
1 Feminism has wide-ranging "bailey," & historically DOES attack family 2 No, but exaltation of homosexuality does.
@HPluckrose@Europa14922 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @AnonMuser @Europa1492
Attacks rigid gender roles which limit women.No, you can exalt homosexuality loads. Won't affect a single trad family
5 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
.
@HPluckrose@Europa1492 And here we come to feminist dogma. "Rigid gender roles" "limit women"->False. Every woman has the right to life.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
The "roles" of mother and wife are 1) gender-specific by biological necessity, and 2) completely voluntary.
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @AnonMuser
.
@HPluckrose@Europa1492 And the roles of mother and wife serve to INCREASE the numbers of one's clan/society. Unlike homosexuals.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @AnonMuser @Europa1492
Yes. The former wld be useful in times of underpopulation, latter in times of overpopulation. Both morally neutral.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
> underpopulation Why do you think Europe and increasingly US have the need to import migrant labour? .
@HPluckrose@Europa14922 replies 0 retweets 1 like
We've a long way to go before we need to worry about underpopulation.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.