How does either assault the traditional family? Feminism has its problems but these mostly demonise men & disempower women.
-
-
.
@HPluckrose@Europa1492 And here we come to feminist dogma. "Rigid gender roles" "limit women"->False. Every woman has the right to life. -
I am talking abt the rigid gender roles which do limit women. Their complement limits men. Both have right to life.
-
.
@HPluckrose@Europa1492 I'm denying such as a thing as "gender role" exist in a rigid fashion. It is a time-tested convention for happiness -
Well, they do. Men must be hard-working & successful. Women must be nurturing & stay at home. Mostly defeated them.
-
Wrong. 1) Replace MUST by SHOULD (big difference), and 2) This only applies if one wants happiness. .
@HPluckrose@Europa1492 -
If every1 was happy w/ traditional gender roles, I doubt there'd ever have been a drive to escape them. I wouldn't be
-
Family is like democracy. Not every one needs it. If you have a better alternative for happiness, go for it! Choice .
@HPluckrose@Europa1492 -
Then what are we disagreeing about?
- 9 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Promoting homosexuality is turning sex into a purely self-indulgent degenerate pleasure, much like porn.
-
Sex is mostly for pleasure. I only wanted two kids. Still have sex.
-
Also sexual pleasure and the associated biological responses are important for pair bonding/maintenance.
-
That works for same sex couples too.
-
yes the biological response can cause genetic death if misdirected.
-
Which is fine. There's no moral imperative to carry on one's genes.
-
That is THE moral imperative.
-
Why? Why is it morally better to have kids than not have kids?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Feminism tells women they are oppressed if they marry and have kids and encourages homosexuality.
-
Doesn't matter whether homosexuality encouraged or not. People either fancy same sex or don't.
-
2... by sexual deviants to embrace homosexuality as some sort of sexual "liberation".
-
Have you? And these ppl were able to suddenly become gay, were they?
-
You apparently don't know people involved in roller-derby.
-
We could all be bisexual to a certain extent. However, I don't see why this matters.
-
We could be if we didn't want a cohesive, safe society.
-
Naturally, we could be. Other apes are. Are societies which tolerate homosexuality less safe than ones that prohibit? Nope.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.