if you had attacked "atheism" instead of "atheists" he probably would have engaged in lively debate.
-
-
Replying to @goosegill @HPluckrose
So I make a post about how we should not be at war with Islam & he comes in against it, saying it's fair game.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MrMubinShaikh @goosegill
Yes. Its OK for sceptics to regard faith as a problem & argue against it vigorously & for the faithful to do same.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This is how ideas evolve - by being challenged by opposing ones. What is not OK is attacking Muslims or atheists.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @goosegill
Basically, the Atheists want2say religion is to blame &that's their A Priori assumption they come into it with.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MrMubinShaikh @goosegill
Yes, many ppl argue that religion is both erroneous and causes much harm to society. U can convince me both false.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @goosegill
It has good & bad cuz ppl are not perfect. Look how many social agencies came about due2religion.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
But to tell +billion Muslims that Islam causes terrorism is to say you are not real Muslims unless U kill & bomb.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MrMubinShaikh @goosegill
That doesn't follow.pic.twitter.com/uvwhKh3cNZ
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @goosegill
Well at best, we can say religious interpretation lends itself to killing & I agree it can (& does).
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Thank you. We can tackle the violence that is motivated by it then. As well as violence motivated by other things.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.