-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
You get people to accept Mohammed sometimes was immoral, a lot can follow from that.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Locke1689
Which is relevant to conversations abt whether Muhammad was immoral but many other conversations exist.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
But most other convos with Muslims hit barrier of "but Mohammed's revelation says X". So you need to bring in his credibility.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Locke1689
Which brings me back to my first tweet. "God exists/does not exist" "Muhammad is great/evil" shutting down wider conversation.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
My point is, it doesn't. Usually Aisha's age argument forces them to accept either Mo was imperfect or Hadith inaccurate.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Locke1689
.
@Locke1689 You find that making every conversation re: Islam about paedophilia facilitates wider conversation abt tolerance & co-existence?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
.
@Locke1689 I find it makes people rage at each other on this one topic and never get to the wider ones at all.3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose
eg,In what way will 'Muhammad was perfect/a paedophile' assist a conversation abt whether faith schools increase radicalisation?
@Locke16891 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Because it forces people to reject a fundamentalist view of Islam, for one where the Hadith or Mohammed had mistakes.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Except they're more likely to say you don't understand Islam and go away.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.