@HPluckrose Yet, at the same time, you have no interest in the subject matter and refuse to discuss it further.

It's a silly non-subject. Bit embarrassing. But nothing stopping you from discussing it. Other ppl don't have to.
-
-
It's somehow embarrassing to consider what death consists of when trying to explain death? ... Interesting.
-
Metaphysics is embarrassing. Book doesn't explain death. Doesn't assume ppl magically survive it coz no good reason to think so
-
Just focus on that one sentence: "book doesn't explain death". Thank you.
-
I already know this! Its you who seems to think it should focus on death & metaphysically.Its about *living* in light of death.
-
If he wrote a book about living, and made no claims about death, then we'd be having a different discussion.
-
Lets not have a discussion. You object to ppl assuming that death is the end coz no reason to think otherwise. Deal with it.
-
This discussion is just people fretting that the author is expected to actually define and explain the subject matter.
-
Not people. You. You think the book shld be abt the nature of death & include woo. Others are interested in what it is about.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.