I don't believe that you did; apparently you don't explain or account for death in any fundamental sense.
Can't really insist ppl write books abt what u consider 'death in a fundamental sense' (if you don't consider brain-death such)
-
-
@GodDoesnt It's not a medical treatise on "brain death". He claims we have only one life to live, death is the end, etc. -
If you want to write something claiming we can survive the deaths of our brain, go do that. I'd rather read this.
-
Fine, treat his work like some holy text. Point is, you need to engage the subject rather than assume the answers.
-
No, honestly, ppl can write all sorts of things without engaging 'metaphysics.' We don't all need that silliness..
-
Do you make a habit of telling authors they shld be writing abt the things that interest u rather than their intended audience?
-
Aren't there enough books abt metaphysics? Haven't centuries of books bizarrely assumed this? Can't there be books which don't?
-
the general claim that metaphysical texts "bizarrely assume" things is, itself, a bizarre assumption.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.