Yes, but many conflate private company's rules with government censorship. Not a 1st amendment issue.
-
-
Argue with those people then. Also Maajid & I are English. I wrote this for these people.pic.twitter.com/BSr6TwylmF
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
If a white supremacist steps on my private property, it is not anti-free speech for me to kick them out.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
No. That's a different subject altogether. You don't have to open your house to everyone.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Twitter is private. It's not a public space.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NosesMalone @MaajidNawaz
The fact that Twitter *can* choose to ban ppl doesn't mean we can't criticise them for doing so.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @MaajidNawaz
I'm criticizing the merits of your criticism.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NosesMalone @MaajidNawaz
I'm in favour of Twitter leaving bigoted ppl to speak so I can argue with them & to defend my own free speech.pic.twitter.com/tgcD6EdZ5V
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @MaajidNawaz
Does it violate the principle of FS for a group of scientists to ban creationists from a private conference?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
After all, they could hear the creationist out and point out his errors. Rather than simply banning him.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
But freedom of speech doesn't include the right to make others listen anyway. I mute ppl regularly but wldnt ban.
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose @MaajidNawaz
But the scientists ought to provide him a microphone, in order to respect the principle of freedom of speech.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.