.@LouisFarrakhan black supremacism ok for minorities,but alt-right banned? Guess we "ethnics" are just illiberal.Bigotry of low expectations
-
-
Replying to @MaajidNawaz
.
@Twitter is private company,can set its own rules.I'd prefer free speech,with red-line at violent incitement,but I'd settle for consistency13 replies 119 retweets 290 likes -
Replying to @MaajidNawaz @Twitter
Ppl have trouble understanding that you can support a company's right to its own rules whilst criticising those rules
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes -
Yes, but many conflate private company's rules with government censorship. Not a 1st amendment issue.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Argue with those people then. Also Maajid & I are English. I wrote this for these people.pic.twitter.com/BSr6TwylmF
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
If a white supremacist steps on my private property, it is not anti-free speech for me to kick them out.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
No. That's a different subject altogether. You don't have to open your house to everyone.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Twitter is private. It's not a public space.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NosesMalone @MaajidNawaz
The fact that Twitter *can* choose to ban ppl doesn't mean we can't criticise them for doing so.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @MaajidNawaz
I'm criticizing the merits of your criticism.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
No, you're continuing to assert that Twitter is a private company. Haven't addressed the criticism yet.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.