Social media's cultural blind spot. Non-violent alt-right banned,but non-violent Islamists ok? #Orientalism rebooted https://www.google.co.uk/amp/www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/37997864?client=safari …
-
-
If a white supremacist steps on my private property, it is not anti-free speech for me to kick them out.
-
No. That's a different subject altogether. You don't have to open your house to everyone.
-
Twitter is private. It's not a public space.
-
The fact that Twitter *can* choose to ban ppl doesn't mean we can't criticise them for doing so.
-
I'm criticizing the merits of your criticism.
-
I'm in favour of Twitter leaving bigoted ppl to speak so I can argue with them & to defend my own free speech.pic.twitter.com/tgcD6EdZ5V
-
Does it violate the principle of FS for a group of scientists to ban creationists from a private conference?
-
We have agreed that people can pick their own rules. We will agree with some & not with others.
- 14 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
problem is it's one sided blm and anti trump crowd can harass and threaten and not get banned
-
Yes, that one thing Twitter is criticised for.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I've been explicitly threatened by many white supremacists on Twitter this year. Threats of genocide.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.