Coz the assumption is there that someone requires an intervention to instill doubt re: an unsubstantiated truth claim.
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
I disagree with this assumption. What if, when James explained himself, I agreed with him? Would I want him to doubt?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @iDanSimpson @HPluckrose
Could this conversation also have gone better if James didn't take a condescending approach?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @iDanSimpson
I kind of saw that the other way round. :-/ I thought SE in a scenario of political disagreement came across as condescending.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @iDanSimpson
Don't want to discuss your or James' attitudes, as such.I know you both to be sincere & well-motivated but discussion technique
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @iDanSimpson
I think if one person speaking naturally abt his position & the other 'could you be wrong? & 'Sorry you feel that way'...1/2
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @iDanSimpson
it turns into an intervention rather than a conversation on a subject that can be argued for or against with reasoned points.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
You've conflated my intentions based on the method I choose to engage.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @iDanSimpson
No, I really haven't. I am 100% positive that your intention is always to have a productive and respectful conversation.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Yes. You assumed and admitted it.pic.twitter.com/AT46aHXUUZ
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
I certainly do not think you wld ever intend to belittle any1. Was interested in discussing approach. I assume good intentions
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.