SE style works equally well on all claims, but the quality of exploration of the validity of justification for certainty of belief often >
No, I really haven't. I am 100% positive that your intention is always to have a productive and respectful conversation.
-
-
-
With Street Epistemology. Yes. Its an intervention re a belief held with more certainty than warranted. Don't you think so?
-
I don't think so. Not necessarily. I can use it to help myself understand others better
-
Maybe that's the difference then.Maybe that's why I see potential for it to be seen as condescension in some circs & u don't.
-
Where do we draw the line between asking respectful questions about the justification behind people's beliefs and condescension?
-
I don't think there's a line between those as such. We can be condescending abt it or not.
-
But it's also such a subjective thing from the other side. Easy to feel condescended to.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I'm interested in SE & whether it could be counterproductive & give wrong impression sometimes. Your convo made me think this
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
