Possibly. But only 2% of people are so that's OK.
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
so it doesn't make logical sense? I think the figure is closer to 10 btw. Also, does excessive anal sex damage the anus?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jonnyjenda
If the purpose of sex & relationships is to produce children, homosexual sex won't do that. However, nobody thinks it will.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
isn't that the point of human life? Aren't all our actions implicitly geared towards reproduction? Choice is different.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jonnyjenda
No. We choose our own point. We do not have to be guided by the biological imperative.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
we all are. Which is why you eat, work, etc. Survival.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jonnyjenda
It doesn't have to be our purpose to life. Its not mine. I chose how many children I had.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
though experiment: if we put 10 healthy hetero/homo couples on two remote islands, which population would survive?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jonnyjenda
Irrelevant. Some ppl are gay. Get over it. Do your own thing.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
gosh I'm only asking you cos you're an intelligent lady and want to pick your brains.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Having babies or not having babies are both morally fine. Same sex couples having kids by other means is also morally fine.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.