Not sure. I can't figure out what @ScottTalling means. How would it be practically applied?
-
-
Replying to @SlagOffTwits @HPluckrose
In case of my eg re drink driving (earlier tweet), punishment for DD+killing would reduce & for DD alone increase.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ScottTalling
Sounds like punishing a group for sins of another. Would murder be reduced and manslaughter increased?
@HPluckrose2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @SlagOffTwits @ScottTalling
More like attempted murder and murder, I think. Talking abt intentions.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
If someone shot 6 times into a crowd killing no-one, same sentence as someone who'd done same & killed 6 ppl?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @ScottTalling
Ah, ok. I think I got it. Still not sure tho. I don't like the idea of punishing for something that didn't happen.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @SlagOffTwits @ScottTalling
Me neither. Not sure how to justify this reasonably if we punish actions tho. Scott sees it as revenge.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Isn't punishment always a form of revenge? Caught breaking rules, society exacts vengeance.
@ScottTalling1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @SlagOffTwits @ScottTalling
Whether you think it revenge or deterrent or protecting society, shld same price be paid 4 breaking same rules?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose
There r different rules for discharging a weapon carelessly and murder. Are rules the issue, or possible outcome?
@ScottTalling2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
There cld be all sorts of reasons that make the same actions more culpable but set them aside & focus on outcome
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.