that seems to only cover things that are overt. For example, people keep giving him benefit of doubt and possible vague meanings
In fact, if u look honestly at everything I have said &done & advocated, you'll see what my motivations are. No mind-reading needed
-
-
My point is that ppl (by which I mean *my* ppl - liberals) need to be charitable & not mind-read according to agendas.
-
I think reading ppl charitably works even when u've good reason to think them ill-motivated.
@DerekGTpic.twitter.com/OxBprgHB5x
-
the problem is people like Rubin who give clearly wrong people a platform and just let them get away with saying anything.Argue!
-
I don't know. We certainly need arguers but ppl can just present views too. I'm an arguer personally.
-
I don't know if I agree. If you use your following to give right wing nutjobs a voice & don't argue, same as saying it yourself
-
Yeah, more credibility if you do this with people from all over the spectrum.
-
but I would argue you should attach your analysis of each
-
I prefer to watch those kinds too.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
yeah, this. If you ONLY have what they say, makes sense not to assume. But if you have more info, makes sense to use it
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.