Yes. If I see a statement about me as motivated by sexism but speaker says it was not related to gender at all, he's the authority on this. https://twitter.com/DerekActual/status/792715797248417792 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
That's hard. Some people really are lying about what they mean. Donald Trump claims he's the "least racist person." 99th chance?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DerekGT
Helen Pluckrose Retweeted Helen Pluckrose
Helen Pluckrose added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
that seems to only cover things that are overt. For example, people keep giving him benefit of doubt and possible vague meanings
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DerekGT
Yes. Things which are overt can be called. Things which aren't cannot. Ppl can only be judged on what they actually say.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
If someone who is a known racist/sexist w/e who has been called out before for smthing overt says smthing vague, not convincing
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DerekGT
Not suggesting it is. Still need to address what ppl actually say rather than our perception of their motivations.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
as long as they can plausibly deny, that mentality allows them to continue winking in safety. Not saying everyone does this.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DerekGT
If an accusation can be plausibly denied based on what was actually said, we shld not try to mind-read & claim to know better.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
I'm just saying sometimes there's a history. You can actually accurately make predictions based on previous words sometimes.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Yes. We can show it and address that to support criticism of person, not try to mind-read.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.