It's not a straightforward ethical case. It fact, it's the most difficult one I've faced, I think.
OK. We don't need to consider emotional/psychological costs at all then. Women are compensated.
-
-
I excluding this temporarily, if that's alright. https://twitter.com/bristolben/status/792113988805025792 …
This Tweet is unavailable. -
No, honestly, its fine. I can't argue for considering emotional/psychological costs & financial ones by excluding the former.
-
So, excluding emotions, from a purely rational perspective do you agree with this? https://twitter.com/bristolben/status/792115993082466306 …
This Tweet is unavailable. -
Yes, if we exclude emotions, the argument that we should consider emotional costs doesn't matter at all.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.