I do think there are significant differences between the consequences of deciding whether to have a child & deciding whether to pay for it.
-
-
You could prob work out a fair 'compensation' which wld allow men to take some responsibility & help but not be bound forever.
-
You also have to take the well-being of the child into consideration. It's a tough one.
-
Yes. Kids need things.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I suggest, to make progress, to simplify the problem and take both the interest of the child and the woman's possible aversion>
-
to having an abortion out of the equation for now. We can add them later and see how they affects things.
-
But that is the issue. Taking into account emotional/psychological toll of abortion AND financial toll of not having one.
-
OK, so do we agree *in absence of the issues I mentioned* that given that the woman has the sole right to decide on whether->
-
to become a parent, she should have the responsibility that come with that right? That she cannot transfer that responsibility->
-
to someone who has no control over that decision. After all, we can only be held responsible for what we can control.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.