Personally I favor creating some option for men to divest themselves of parental responsibilities and rights early in pregnancy.
-
-
Replying to @TheDecentTech
I think there shld be something in place so greater responsibility is with other but both are responsible for child's birth.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @TheDecentTech
That's the thing. It varies so much from case to case. If a man is misled deliberately, he should be able to walk away.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @TheDecentTech
If a cpl plan baby & man changes his mind in 2nd trimester when woman already bonded & excited, he shld still pay support.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @TheDecentTech
Cases can be anywhere between those. Think a judge shld factor it in if they can't work it out themselves.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Sure. That's why I noted as "early pregnancy"-- I agree with your point that 2nd trimester is far too late to walk away.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @TheDecentTech
Sorry, u did say that. Still think it might not be that simple. He cld say he'd abort but he'll never have to prove he could
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @TheDecentTech @HPluckrose
As to the other point: I don't expect this to be simple, but I do think we need to give men *some*thing.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I think so too. If a woman wants a baby & a man doesn't, he should be less responsible.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.