What is? What I just said is the argument. Peter's not arguing OK to refuse service to gay ppl.
You can call it that but by law people are allowed to make that argument. And they shld be. So we can argue back.
-
-
Your argument seems to be that freedom of expression should only be allowed to those expressing views you approve.
-
not at all: we have laws that prevent incitement to racial hatred. Quite right too.
-
Exactly as I thought. Authoritarian. You can only say what I agree with. Further conversation pointless.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.