I'd suggest I can show you that men & women have observable brain differences by the fact that I've just done so. https://twitter.com/NurtureMyBaby/status/789963225186074624 …
-
-
What if philosophy informed by anatomy could predict neural correlates? Would philosophy then be a science?
-
Would it still be philosophy? Or would it be a scientific hypothesis? I don't know.
-
Nor do I. Your framing just happened to elicit the question, one which I haven't thought much about before, to tell the truth.
-
I try not to think about philosophy if I can help it. Boghossian & Blackford have redeemed it somewhat but I'm still wary.
-
I've gotten the most mileage out of the pragmatists, Dewey and Rorty primarily. There are useful humanist lessons there.
-
Noted.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Pls look at the studies I have linked. They address Joel's claims which are ideologically motivated & debunked.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
also allows us to think clearly about notion of gender identity and what qus we need to ask of science.
-
But you also need to read the science. Please don't tweet me again until you have.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
it tells us whether observing general differences w/ large overlap allows us to correctly assign brains as M or F. (Answer's no)
-
Read it & then write a response.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
unsure if 1 retweet sufficient
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.