In which case yours is as subjective as everyone else's.
-
-
Radfems go on gonads & chromosomes usually. Biologists will point out these don't always match.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Religious ppl go on gonads & scriptures. Neuroscientists look at brains. Identitarians focus on personal ID.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose
so I'm wrong because some people think x? Just tell me.why I'm wrong. Much easier.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NurtureMyBaby
I don't say you're wrong to define woman on gonads (if that's what you do.) I'm saying there's more to the conversation.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @NurtureMyBaby
I have said why there is more to 'woman' than gonads. Brains & chromosomes also sig & may disagree.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @NurtureMyBaby
On top of the conflicting info from brains, gonads & chromosomes, there are subjective, ideological views including yours.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @NurtureMyBaby
These may take some bits of science but only the ones that agree with them. Not terribly helpful but have right to exist
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
not sure how helpful science is when u think "sex" is something other than relating to who makes eggs + sperm + carries babies.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
I am talking about the arguments and evidence behind a variety of definitions of 'woman.'
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.