I am not saying that its complicated using subjective definitions unless u mean I'm saying diff views exist,
-
-
In which case yours is as subjective as everyone else's.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Radfems go on gonads & chromosomes usually. Biologists will point out these don't always match.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Religious ppl go on gonads & scriptures. Neuroscientists look at brains. Identitarians focus on personal ID.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose
so I'm wrong because some people think x? Just tell me.why I'm wrong. Much easier.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NurtureMyBaby
I don't say you're wrong to define woman on gonads (if that's what you do.) I'm saying there's more to the conversation.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @NurtureMyBaby
I have said why there is more to 'woman' than gonads. Brains & chromosomes also sig & may disagree.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @NurtureMyBaby
On top of the conflicting info from brains, gonads & chromosomes, there are subjective, ideological views including yours.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
yes if the correct definition of "sex" is an ideology. Which would mean everything cld. be termed "ideological"
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
It is ideology which decides which is the correct definition of 'woman' whether you call this sex or gender.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.