Look at previous tweet. All of those are willing to say why they're right.
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose @nitpickette01
sorry? A subjective def'n is useful how? @CravusVermelhus
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NurtureMyBaby @nitpickette01
I have not claimed a subjective definition to be useful. Please address what I am actually saying.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @nitpickette01
ur saying defnn of woman is complicated citing subjective defn. So I ask sub defn useful how? @CravusVermelhus
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NurtureMyBaby @nitpickette01
I am not saying that its complicated using subjective definitions unless u mean I'm saying diff views exist,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
In which case yours is as subjective as everyone else's.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Radfems go on gonads & chromosomes usually. Biologists will point out these don't always match.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose
yes very rarely people are intersex. Still woman = adult human female. Just like we are bipedal despite rare exceptions.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NurtureMyBaby
But what makes you female? Is it your gonads, your chromosomes or your brain? What if they say different things?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
generally sex organs that produce ova and grow babies.+ yes this allows for illness/injury affecting said organs. But answer me
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Helen Pluckrose Retweeted Helen Pluckrose
Helen Pluckrose added,
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.