@nitpickette01 @HPluckrose what's this? Woman = female adult human. What's not to understand?
-
-
ur saying defnn of woman is complicated citing subjective defn. So I ask sub defn useful how? @CravusVermelhus
-
I am not saying that its complicated using subjective definitions unless u mean I'm saying diff views exist,
-
In which case yours is as subjective as everyone else's.
-
Radfems go on gonads & chromosomes usually. Biologists will point out these don't always match.
-
Religious ppl go on gonads & scriptures. Neuroscientists look at brains. Identitarians focus on personal ID.
-
so I'm wrong because some people think x? Just tell me.why I'm wrong. Much easier.
-
I don't say you're wrong to define woman on gonads (if that's what you do.) I'm saying there's more to the conversation.
-
pls tell me I'm wrong. Just tell me WHY.
- 8 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
u defended subjective defn. I told u it was crap. U said you had explained why this defn was fine...only u didn't
-
and if you don't think its useful why raise it to defend this "its solo complicated"/viewpoint @CravusVermelhus
-
More views than yours exist. Yours is ideological. Scientific ones, religious ones, other ideological ones.
-
I tend to favour science. That's the least subjective.
-
so what's your scientific definition then?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.