I believe those things are already covered by: Economics Politic History Law Psychology Sociology Anthropology And underwater basketweavinghttps://twitter.com/HPluckrose/status/788721701592981505 …
-
-
Replying to @TonyChiaroscuro
All of those things are significant to gender, yes. I'm mostly interested in evolutionary psychology. Got a lot to settle.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
theres definitely room for that. Biology Psychology Sociology Anthropology And not so oddly... Economics.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TonyChiaroscuro
Helen Pluckrose Retweeted Helen Pluckrose
See this three part tweet for what I mean.https://twitter.com/HPluckrose/status/788825869015973888 …
Helen Pluckrose added,
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose
@WretchedEsq@YeyoZa agreed. verified repeatedly. The problem gender ideologues have a vested interest in the status quo.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TonyChiaroscuro
But determining the extent of gender differences & how they play out in the world wld be very worthwhile if done properly.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @TonyChiaroscuro
So much time, money & energy spent on trying to make things fair but its not based on much of substance so prob wasted.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
yup. Often pseudo-altruism causes more harm than good. But for the unscrupulous; wonderful opportunity for personal gain.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Yes. I do think most motivated by ideology or by wanting to be part of a moral tribe tho rather than calculated dishonesty
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.