... fundamentally problematic abt men/masulinity, etc. Just as, in 19th C, incl. for Freud, this was true for women.
-
-
Replying to @Friedmanzone @HPluckrose
Actually, I think term was originally meant 2 differentiate. Hence toxic masculinity not just masculinity.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @IonaItalia @Friedmanzone
Yes but same for women. This is good feminity & this is bad femininity. Squash down the bad.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @Friedmanzone
since we're basically talking abt violence & rape here, squashing down is surely a gd thing?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @IonaItalia @Friedmanzone
Yes but not by calling violence & rape 'masculinity.'
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @Friedmanzone
I'm not. That's the kind of thing ppl r often writing abt when they say TOXIC masc, emphasis on toxic.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
You don't see a distinction between 'men are more violence prone' & 'violence is a form of masculinity.' 1/2
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I see a vital one which speaks to essential worth & dignity of men defined by masculinity coz of current climate.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @Friedmanzone
redefining men & celebrating healthy expressions of masculinity I think is a worthwhile project
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Focus on behaviour, yes. Does it hurt anyone? Then its OK. I don't feel men can redefined by any social effort.
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose @Friedmanzone
Agreed. I'm not a fan of identity politics or putting ppl in boxes & labelling them.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.