No, there's v gd evidence 2 suggest men far more prone to violence (again, talking abt a significant *minority*)
-
-
Replying to @IonaItalia @HPluckrose
Trouble is, there's also good evidence, many places, that young black males, say, are esp. violent. But I'm ...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
... guessing you wdnt want to associate such violence with their race? (To be clear: neither would I!)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Friedmanzone @HPluckrose
I wldnt. But every piece of evidence we hv thro all of history suggests a diff in the rate at which men 1/2
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @IonaItalia @HPluckrose
Right. But the objection I have is associating particular failing with an aspect of a person that they never chose.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Friedmanzone @HPluckrose
Toxic behaviour is sthing u can choose. This is v rarely applied 2 individs. It's a term from academic sociology
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @IonaItalia @HPluckrose
Sorry - I've no problem with calling someone's behaviour "toxic". Adding "masculinity" doesn't add anything helpful.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Friedmanzone @HPluckrose
2/2 educational needs when it comes 2 fostering gd behaviour.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @IonaItalia @Friedmanzone
I think we all accept that. Gender differences exist. I can't think how to put it any more clearly than already.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @Friedmanzone
This is just part of the lang certain academic disciplines use 2 talk abt 1 of those diffs.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
I know. I think its problematic for the reasons I've given.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.