@Muslamics @dlalaurie0
We were discussing who the main victims of *Muslims* were.
-
-
Does that mean you can't prove it?
-
No, I can't. If you say Islam more danger to non-muslims, I'll look into it. What are you thinking of?
-
Pakistani Christians? Yazidis? Atheists? Does this match interfactional fighting? I don't know, tbh
-
if you cant prove it perhaps you should spend more time pondering over it
-
Can I just ask? Do you think it wld be a good thing if it turned out non-Muslims main victim of Islam?
-
I've been denying this coz its usually claimed by the far-right to oppose Muslim immigration.
-
And they are not usually credible whilst (true) liberals arguing with them usually know their stuff.
-
Obviously the facts of the matter are not affected by the motivations of the ppl quoting them.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Let me know when you can prove it is 'because of Islam'
-
I'm talking abt killings done specifically in the name of Islam.
-
Some westerners like to claim non-Muslims most at threat.
-
Don't think so. Very little harm done to non-Muslims by Muslims statistically
-
In the name of Islam, that is & in comparison to interfactional fighting.
-
So when u invade a country because of 'freedom', the cause was Freedom and its that simple?
-
No. Various causes for atrocities exist. Nationalism, imperialism etc as well as religion.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.