If someone said 'Anyone with an atheist avatar who talks abt epistemology, block me!" I'd see humour.
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose @Intrinsic29 and
"Any1 w 'We can do it!" avatar who talks abt wage gaps!" Anyone w a happy humanist who says sky-fairy!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @Intrinsic29 and
It invokes a type & expresses having experienced a deluge of them. So very different to >
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @Intrinsic29 and
> a po-faced "I block anyone who uses this language & symbolism cos they're terrible people."
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I don't interpret the tweet as facetious and many of his defenders have defended it to me as if it wasnt
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
OK, well time will tell. If he now speaks or writes of the dangers of frog avatars & the word 'cuck'...
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This is disingenuous imo. My claim is he was likely just angry and venting. Not joking around.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Pls don't accuse me of being other than sincere. I've said what seemed clear to me.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Sorry. I think I got a little irritated after the humorless accusation.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I think you can be too literal sometimes. Too conscientious, maybe, abt logical consistency ->
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
-> even when someone is being humorous or having a frustrated not-serious-argument rant.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.