No, as I've expressed, I think it was a moment of frustrated anger and that's fine.
-
-
I think it was funny.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I honestly think you'd call the same tweet out if a so called sjw or 'Feminist made it.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I'm not being hypocritical, Kevin. I genuinely don't think it was a serious division-making attempt.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @Intrinsic29 and
If someone said 'Anyone with an atheist avatar who talks abt epistemology, block me!" I'd see humour.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
It would depend on context. This tweet was among a string of very serious anti Trump tweets.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
He's very seriously anti-Trump. That's why he's getting called cuck a lot by ppl w frog avatars.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Yes and this tweet was among a string of very serious tweets.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Yes. OK, lets leave it.U require him to clarify not literally a word & an avatar he has a problem with
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Not really. I think it'd be a good idea but I don't think this is a big deal. Just worth my response imo
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I think u've missed the point but if u say many others see it your way, perhaps it is unclear.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.