His time is valuable, and to waste it on trolls diminishes his overall effectiveness. @shnrvr82 @HPluckrose
If someone said 'Anyone with an atheist avatar who talks abt epistemology, block me!" I'd see humour.
-
-
"Any1 w 'We can do it!" avatar who talks abt wage gaps!" Anyone w a happy humanist who says sky-fairy!
-
It invokes a type & expresses having experienced a deluge of them. So very different to >
-
> a po-faced "I block anyone who uses this language & symbolism cos they're terrible people."
-
I don't interpret the tweet as facetious and many of his defenders have defended it to me as if it wasnt
-
OK, well time will tell. If he now speaks or writes of the dangers of frog avatars & the word 'cuck'...
-
This is disingenuous imo. My claim is he was likely just angry and venting. Not joking around.
-
I think its both! Frustration expressed humorously.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It would depend on context. This tweet was among a string of very serious anti Trump tweets.
-
He's very seriously anti-Trump. That's why he's getting called cuck a lot by ppl w frog avatars.
-
Yes and this tweet was among a string of very serious tweets.
-
Yes. OK, lets leave it.U require him to clarify not literally a word & an avatar he has a problem with
-
Not really. I think it'd be a good idea but I don't think this is a big deal. Just worth my response imo
-
I think u've missed the point but if u say many others see it your way, perhaps it is unclear.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.