That's possible in my case. I also recognize not many of them actually serve good purposes like Sam. @shnrvr82 @HPluckrose
I'm not being hypocritical, Kevin. I genuinely don't think it was a serious division-making attempt.
-
-
If someone said 'Anyone with an atheist avatar who talks abt epistemology, block me!" I'd see humour.
-
"Any1 w 'We can do it!" avatar who talks abt wage gaps!" Anyone w a happy humanist who says sky-fairy!
-
It invokes a type & expresses having experienced a deluge of them. So very different to >
-
> a po-faced "I block anyone who uses this language & symbolism cos they're terrible people."
-
I don't interpret the tweet as facetious and many of his defenders have defended it to me as if it wasnt
-
OK, well time will tell. If he now speaks or writes of the dangers of frog avatars & the word 'cuck'...
-
This is disingenuous imo. My claim is he was likely just angry and venting. Not joking around.
-
I think its both! Frustration expressed humorously.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It sends a message of tribalism. I've already had several Harris fans defend the division interpretation
-
So if he didn't mean that, then he's at best confusing his fans imo.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.