No. Its the rationale for criminalising open displays of homosexuality & atheism.
Yes. Same case can be made for banning expressions of atheism & homosexuality. This is a "but I'm right, they're wrong' argument.
-
-
I agree that you're right & they are wrong but will show this by arguing the ideas, not banning one of them. Cld be done to us.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Don't C how people can claim victimhood rm "expressions of atheism & homosexuality", while simultaneously trying to harm them
@HPluckrose -
We always harm those we see as a threat.
-
Agree.
@HPluckrose And then claiming victim-hood (actually succeeding at that false claim) should be called out. (No justice 4 real victims) -
Yes, we can do that.
-
Maybe I am not a BIG liberal
@HPluckrose I believe FOE should have some limited restrictions. Judicious restrictions good for "humanity" -
Thank You for this engagement
@HPluckrose Won't take more of your time
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.