what does falsification entail in this context?
-
-
Replying to @SlenderSkeptic @SkepticNikki
contradictory claims, I suppose.
@CultOfEh is good at this1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @iDanSimpson
Dan, can you tell me a god claim that hasn't been or you feel can't be falsified?
@iDanSimpson@SlenderSkeptic@SkepticNikki5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CultOfEh
Eh, you know me well, I am practically a gnostic atheist, yet not, epistemologically.
@CultOfEh@SlenderSkeptic@SkepticNikki2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
curious, do you believe a gnostic theist can exist, by this definition of things?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
nope. Not epistemologically. Practically, yes, folks can love their lives as if there is no god
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I think you misread the question.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
i answered the question 2 different ways.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @iDanSimpson @SlenderSkeptic and
Here's a more simple answer: Gnostic theists and gnostic atheist, are really agnostic.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @iDanSimpson
Only if you require 100% certainty to step away from agnosticism. Knowledge doesn't req 100%
@iDanSimpson@SlenderSkeptic@SkepticNikki4 replies 1 retweet 1 like
That's the difference. I think its in perspective & definitions only.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.