Right. I'm only referring to claims that fit the before offered definition and have been falsified. Those I can demonstrate.https://twitter.com/iDanSimpson/status/785576915943952384 …
-
-
Replying to @SkepticNikki
so, are you Gnostic Atheist about ALL god claims, or the ones that have been falsified?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @iDanSimpson @SkepticNikki
what does falsification entail in this context?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SlenderSkeptic @SkepticNikki
contradictory claims, I suppose.
@CultOfEh is good at this1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @iDanSimpson
Dan, can you tell me a god claim that hasn't been or you feel can't be falsified?
@iDanSimpson@SlenderSkeptic@SkepticNikki5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CultOfEh
Eh, you know me well, I am practically a gnostic atheist, yet not, epistemologically.
@CultOfEh@SlenderSkeptic@SkepticNikki2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @iDanSimpson @CultOfEh and
I'm with you. I think gods no more likely that the staunchest gnostic atheist.
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like
But I can't claim to *know* things I cannot know. No matter how much I disbelieve.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.