Right. I'm only referring to claims that fit the before offered definition and have been falsified. Those I can demonstrate.https://twitter.com/iDanSimpson/status/785576915943952384 …
-
-
Replying to @SkepticNikki
so, are you Gnostic Atheist about ALL god claims, or the ones that have been falsified?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @iDanSimpson @SkepticNikki
what does falsification entail in this context?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SlenderSkeptic @SkepticNikki
contradictory claims, I suppose.
@CultOfEh is good at this1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @iDanSimpson
Dan, can you tell me a god claim that hasn't been or you feel can't be falsified?
@iDanSimpson@SlenderSkeptic@SkepticNikki5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CultOfEh
i could try, But really, I want to know if a god claim can be disproved if you haven't heard it yet
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @iDanSimpson
It's impossible to disprove an unknown. Saying "there might be some god-like being that's never been described" is silly, imo
@iDanSimpson4 replies 1 retweet 5 likes
It is. That's why this fact does not stop us being atheists. True but irrelevant.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.