Overall harmfulness when harm measured in violence & oppression. Both have been willing to kill & dictate how ppl live & think
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose @Intrinsic29
Both did it on a large scale and for a long time.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Yeah, I don't dispute this but these are caused by dogma in general too. I think we have to look at the deeper traits.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Intrinsic29 @HPluckrose
The scripture may be a wash unless we include hadith (which many don't) but the historical examples of prophets is significant.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Intrinsic29
You cld do some kind of analysis in which you compare bible & magisteria with Quran & ahadith to determine which more violent.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
I think the hadith wins by a landslide but they're hard to compare in likely harmfulness.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Intrinsic29 @HPluckrose
For instance the Qur'an constantly dehumanizes nonbelievers and this likely has extremely consequential ID politics consequences
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Intrinsic29 @HPluckrose
But the Bible does this too. Just differently. Not sure how to contrast them well. But Muhammad was a warlord.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Intrinsic29
Bible is full of warlords. Jesus told a parable in which he was a king who killed everyone who didn't follow him.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
But Jesus wasn't a warlord. Do you really not agree it's easier to see a narrative of a peace loving hippy in Jesus than Mo?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I have said so. If Christians had always followed the life of Jesus, no problem. They didn't. Invoked all the more violent ones
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.