Qualifications or not, their arguments stand or fall on their merit. Why should pointing out flaws ->
-
-
in an ideology (religion) and commenting on its ethics be "hate speech"?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @BristolBen @sherlockmichael
Very little difference between them & thugs ripping veils of women & spitting on them.Just a diff kind of bully
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @katydid_alot
I really don't see this behaviour being condoned by any prominent "new atheist" personality or group. They are arguing ->
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BristolBen @katydid_alot
against certain *ideas*, in the same way that socialists argue against libertarianism. Perhaps some libertarians are hurt ->
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BristolBen @katydid_alot
by socialists deriding their beliefs and feel belittled, even if the criticism isn't personal. Nobody argues that they should
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BristolBen @katydid_alot
be immune from criticism or that their beliefs should never be challenged. Why should we make an exception for religions?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BristolBen
U have yet to explain WHY u, or any unqualified individual, feels justified in going after religions? How is it YR business?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @katydid_alot
.
@katydid_alot@BristolBen I'm so glad you asked.pic.twitter.com/iBjm34Jrcd
2 replies 1 retweet 11 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
.
@katydid_alot@BristolBen Seems odd that only the most informed & qualified ppl can criticise religion whilst anyone can believe in it.3 replies 4 retweets 7 likes
People can criticise religion at the level of their encounter with it.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.