I have nothing against, let's say woman programmer ,so long as they are educated/employed on the same criteria as men
Gender differences make it likely that women will always do most of the childcare but very many of us need more to our lives.
-
-
Most woman WANT to do that. It's against human nature that they should be breadwinner
-
If most women only wanted to do that, I'd suggest that more of us would only do that (where affordable). We have a lot of choice.
-
Most qualifying doctors are now female whilst most qualifying engineers are male. This seems to reflect differences in our nature
-
It's true that jobs involving social skills woman are overrepresented. (again, nothing wrong with that)
-
My objection to feminism is it devalues motherhood.
-
Some branches do and some don't. It usually rejects rigid gender roles but so most non-feminists & anti-feminists.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Again what's more important, analyze an S&P graph in wall street or bringing up a child
-
If you could only choose one or the other, the latter wld be.Most ppl can do both & making this work has nothing to do with gender
-
But time is limited. If you're gonna work 8 hours a day that means some stranger at a kindergarten will raise the kid instead
-
I stayed home until my daughter was 2 & then worked part-time when her dad was at home & when she was at nursery or grandparents.
-
This is a logistical issue rather than an ethical one. It is not in my nature to stay at home with children all day. I'd go nuts.
-
As I said if you want to work, go bananas. However from a macro perspective motherhood are not as cherished as it should
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.