Me too. But there is a time & a place for engaging strangers in conversation. I'd suggest Twitter cos ppl can get away from you, not tube.https://twitter.com/PeterMonnerjahn/status/781479348612333568 …
If you read this as quiet better than ' even conversation which cannot be heard' I think that's a stretch.
-
-
Conversation which cannot be heard by others is quiet.
-
Then why say it’s “problematic” when there is more talking—unless you equate talking w intrusiveness? https://twitter.com/HPluckrose/status/781482080047882240 …
This Tweet is unavailable. -
I do equate it with intrusiveness.It intrudes upon my reading. Ppl have the right to do it but I'll argue its inconsiderate
-
On Twitter, in the abstract. In life, I'll put on white noise or change carriage. Take responsibility for my own peace.
-
.
@PeterMonnerjahn I think lots of things are better than lots of other things & say so. This seems OK to me provided I don't impose them.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You explicitly contrasted “quiet” w “conversation”. Possibly due to space constraints, but hardly a stretch.
-
Yes, because I was talking abt conversation that cant help but be heard by others! If it can't be, how cld it be a problem?
-
Inaudible conversation is indistinguishable from quiet. I'm sorry if you found that misleading but I've now clarified.
-
Yes, I find it misleading that you constantly equivocate between mere chatting and being intrusive. :)
-
I find other people's conversations intrusive when they prevent me from reading on the train. Its not complicated.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.