Me too. But there is a time & a place for engaging strangers in conversation. I'd suggest Twitter cos ppl can get away from you, not tube.https://twitter.com/PeterMonnerjahn/status/781479348612333568 …
I have conceded from the start that if you can chat without disturbing others, this is not inconsiderate.
-
-
And yet you keep implying the opposite. That is the inconsistency I keep trying to make you see. :)
-
That's simply not true. See initial meme thing I wrote. Show me once where I've said talking is wrong even if bothers no-1
-
I’ve already shown you three times, whenever I mentioned “inconsistency” in this thread. Also: https://twitter.com/HPluckrose/status/781482864500244480 …
This Tweet is unavailable. -
If you read this as quiet better than ' even conversation which cannot be heard' I think that's a stretch.
-
Conversation which cannot be heard by others is quiet.
-
Then why say it’s “problematic” when there is more talking—unless you equate talking w intrusiveness? https://twitter.com/HPluckrose/status/781482080047882240 …
This Tweet is unavailable. -
I do equate it with intrusiveness.It intrudes upon my reading. Ppl have the right to do it but I'll argue its inconsiderate
-
On Twitter, in the abstract. In life, I'll put on white noise or change carriage. Take responsibility for my own peace.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.