They are borne. Not suggesting arresting ppl for it. Making an argument that its inconsiderate.
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
Nobody says that’s what you’re suggesting. My arg: it’s not just not inconsiderate, tolerating it is vital to a liberal society.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PeterMonnerjahn
Tolerating, yes. That wld be not trying to ban it. Can still argue that its more considerate to be quiet in confined space.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Toleration goes further than not advocating legal consequences, I’m afraid. :)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @PeterMonnerjahn
If tolerating things requires me to pretend to think all behaviours equally considerate, I am not tolerant.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose
You’re implicitly equating *any* chatting with being intrusive. That cannot be helpful…
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PeterMonnerjahn
Helpful to what? I'd prefer ppl not to chat to me & to keep their own chat to a level that I can still read.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
My point: nothing abt the badge impinges on that. Nobody will bother non-wearers, & wearers can keep it down. No problem there.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PeterMonnerjahn
No problem then. I'll still promote the anti-chatting tweets!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
It never was abt that promotion but abt an inconsistency in your arguments where those had nothing to do w the badge.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Don't agree that more talking on the underground would be good thing. For many of us, it wld make journey more stressful.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.