I think this largely coz of idea that doing what you want is fine until it impacts other people.
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
That’s not quite correct. You’re getting at a core liberal idea, yes; but impact has to be on *rights*, not just sensibilities.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PeterMonnerjahn
No, I think its OK to argue against anti-social behaviour too. Intrusive, inconsiderate behavious cos of its impact.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Which chatting in itself isn’t, as you grant in the FB paragraph you quoted. A normal chat has nothing to do w intrusiveness.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PeterMonnerjahn
Course not. Only intrusive if other people have to hear it rather than doing what they wanted to do.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
.
@HPluckrose That can be a very subjective thing, this “what I consider to be intrusive”, and we mustn’t base even vague social norms on it.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PeterMonnerjahn
I'm not vague. I'm saying why I think its inconsiderate & people are arguing with me.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Some of those ppl even w the intention of pointing you to inconsistencies in your arguments, so you can improve them. :)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PeterMonnerjahn
Mostly they just seem to think I shouldn't say its inconsiderate & urge people not to do it &retweet funny Brit stereotypes
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @PeterMonnerjahn
I don't think it is inconsistent to argue against a behaviour whilst accepting ppls right to do it.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Its much the same as people who choose not to wash before getting on the tube. I wish they wld but they don't have to.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.