However, I admit that they nearly all begin by saying there's almost nothing written on women's roles in the crusades.
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
This is getting much better. There's lots on the Queens for example. Natasha Hodgson, Danielle Park and many others doing well!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_MartinSmith_
Hodgson is coming up everywhere. So many possible ways into this. Military, nursing, logistics, propaganda, symbolism.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Absolutely! You may also consider female perception of the 'other' and the Muslim vs Christian dichotomy.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_MartinSmith_
Yep. I see Guibert of Nogent gives us the Christian helpmeet of man vs the Muslim nymphomaniacal baby-abandoner.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @_MartinSmith_
But I am only beginning research & am not at all sure where I'm going. Have previously stuck to C14 & 15.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Crusades my specialism! Happy to help if you want it!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_MartinSmith_
Thank you! I've tended to look at how women used religious narratives to negotiate authority & autonomy for selves. 1300-1700
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose
The implication that women are given authority to join or be involved in the Crusade by the Church and thier call to Holy War?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_MartinSmith_
That's what I want to find out. Am finding discouragement from church but also fragilitas to viriliter by power of God trope.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
But this is my first week of reading so am still very uninformed at the mo. Might end up somewhere else completely.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.