By definition, the first life must have come from non-life.
-
-
Replying to @funkyderek @InvitetoGod and
This could have been down to natural processes or it could have been done by a magic space wizard.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Course we'd need some evidence of said super being before it becomes a serious proposition. 1/2
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Yes. It would be ridiculous to simply assume its existence or propose it as an explanation.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Also changes the problem coz if a god exists, he is an earlier form of life & have to work his origins out
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
may not be ur area of interest.r u open 2 the option tht single cell may not hav cum frm random event? Yes or no?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @InvitetoGod
Of course. I'll go with the evidence. Might well have been inevitable like evolution. Something that's bound to happen.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @InvitetoGod
Is anyone arguing it was a random occurrence? Not something which wld naturally occur as a result of normal circumstances?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Leave any1. Am asking u. So u don't believe it was a random event tht happened on its own?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @InvitetoGod
Also 'random' is not the same as 'on its own.' Rain happens on it's own but is not random coz part of a natural process.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Abiogenesis cld well be non-random in the same way. I don't believe it was started by a god coz no evidence of any gods.
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
We'll discuss God in a moment. V r discussing this because u said, u believe in "evidence".
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.