Maajid says no idea is above scrutiny. I agree with that. Hence I scrutinise Quilliam ideas. @HPluckrose @iain_mk2 @m_katoen @MaajidNawaz
-
-
Replying to @REnlightenment @iain_mk2 and
I've argued Y I think support or leaving-alone more helpful here: http://helensatheistblogs.blogspot.co.uk/2016/06/why-atheists-should-support-muslim.html …
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @REnlightenment and
please add a paragraph to this blog explaining what happens to non-Muslims 1/
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @kew_van @HPluckrose and
in the west in the year 2100 if reform fails and Muslim demographics increase
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @kew_van @REnlightenment and
I don't see how that wld add to argument against undermining reform.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @REnlightenment and
because deislamisation policies will more likely be considered
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kew_van @REnlightenment and
Pressure reformers 2 stop making Islam acceptable so u can say it isn't & must go?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @kew_van and
Sweetie, Christianity and Islam are both quackery.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sarah_wardlaw @kew_van and
I know this.pic.twitter.com/nJl9iCQegc
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @kew_van and
Yes, but isn't problem idea they have some kind of monopoly on morals?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Usually, yes. That's why I like reforms 'plurality'
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.