Yes. Can't help it really. Don't see why picking good bits & getting rid of nasty bits is a bad thing?
-
-
They aren't getting rid of anything. They applying spin and interpretation which mainstream Muslims reject.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
That's what religious people do. They think the god is real & perfect & relig must be reformed to fit.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Then they're not reformers, they just another sect.
@TellDramaUK@m_katoen1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Into a semantic issue now then.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Muhammad as an exemplar is a semantic issue? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
@TellDramaUK@m_katoen1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
No.Whether adapting a religion to make it compatible with liberal values is reform or making another a sect
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Differing interpretation is definitely not reform if it ignores the principles that make it need reform.
@TellDramaUK@m_katoen1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
No, it needs to get rid of principles incompatible with liberal, secular democracy. I think it does.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
You think that Muhammad as an exemplar is compatible with liberal, secular democracy? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
@TellDramaUK@m_katoen3 replies 1 retweet 1 like
Depends how they create him. Which bits of him they keep & which bits shove under the carpet.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.