It can obviously be sectarianised, but whether it reformable to a point non-Muslims can accept? Unlikely @HPluckrose @MaajidNawaz
-
-
Differing interpretation is definitely not reform if it ignores the principles that make it need reform.
@TellDramaUK@m_katoen -
No, it needs to get rid of principles incompatible with liberal, secular democracy. I think it does.
-
You think that Muhammad as an exemplar is compatible with liberal, secular democracy? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
@TellDramaUK@m_katoen -
Muhammad isn't compatible. So, they have to reshape him, bend the scriptures. It is intellectually 1)
-
Its a huge problem epistemologically, not ethically.
-
How is challenging the nonsense of religion unethical? Islam is nonsense, no matter how it is revised.
-
Its not. Do it. I do. Every day.
-
Unless it's nonsense coming from Quilliam's interpretation of Aisha's age? You can't see how absurd that is?
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.