It can obviously be sectarianised, but whether it reformable to a point non-Muslims can accept? Unlikely @HPluckrose @MaajidNawaz
-
-
The key term is "reform" not "interpret". Reform implies change from negative ways.
@HPluckrose@MaajidNawaz1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @iain_mk2
.
@iain_mk2@m_katoen@MaajidNawaz The difference between reforming & liberal Muslims is that reformers honestly acknowledge the bad bits.3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Maajid and Usama didn't do too well with that in regards to Muhammad in this thread. They cherry pick.
@m_katoen@MaajidNawaz2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Yes. Can't help it really. Don't see why picking good bits & getting rid of nasty bits is a bad thing?
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @iain_mk2 and
Morally bad, I mean. I see the problem epistemologically.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose
I'm happy they're tackling bad bits, but does that mean we give them a pass on *their* bad bits?
@m_katoen@MaajidNawaz2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
No.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @iain_mk2 and
If you have an ethical problem with the Islam reformers propose, easy enough to say so. I don't cos liberal
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I don't actually care what people believe, as long as they don't force it on others and it doesn't
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I do because I think it matters what we claim to know & how we claim to know it but I support ppl's right to all beliefs
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.